The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Case expected to be dismissed against social workers charged in Gabriel’s death

by City News Service • July 15, 2020 8 Comments

Gabriel Fernandez [File]
PALMDALE – A judge is expected to dismiss charges Thursday against four social workers who were accused of failing to protect an 8-year-old Palmdale boy whose mother and her boyfriend were convicted of his May 2013 torture death, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office announced Wednesday.

District Attorney Jackie Lacey announced in February that “state law is not on our side” in the case of Stefanie Rodriguez and Patricia Clement and their supervisors, Kevin Bom and Gregory Merritt, after a three-justice panel from California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge George G. Lomeli should have granted the defense’s motion to dismiss the case.

The four were charged in March 2016 with one felony count each of child abuse and falsifying public record in connection with Gabriel Fernandez’s death.

“My office vigorously pursued those who directly caused Gabriel’s death and those who failed to intervene to protect him,” the county’s top prosecutor said in a written statement released in February. “While we prevailed against those who inflicted the injuries, the appellate court rejected our theory of criminal liability against the social workers, who my office believed had a duty to protect Gabriel.”

The appellate court panel refused Jan. 23 to reconsider its ruling, and the District Attorney’s Office subsequently decided against asking the California Supreme Court to review the case.

Isauro Aguirre — the boyfriend of Gabriel’s mother — was sentenced to death in June 2018. He was convicted of first-degree murder, and jurors found true the special circumstance allegation of murder involving the infliction of torture.

Gabriel’s mother, Pearl Sinthia Fernandez, was sentenced to life in prison without parole after pleading to first-degree murder and admitting the torture allegation.

An autopsy showed that the Gabriel had a fractured skull, several broken ribs and burns over much of his body. His teacher testified that she called Rodriguez multiple times to report that Gabriel told her that his mother punched him and shot him in the face with a BB gun.

In its Jan. 6 ruling, the appellate court panel found that Rodriguez, Clement, Bom and Merritt “never had the requisite duty to control the abusers and did not have care or custody of Gabriel” for purposes of the child abuse charge leveled against them and that they were “not officers” within the meaning of the Government Code section involving falsification of public records.

Associate Justice Victoria Gerrard Chaney concurred that the four could not be charged with child abuse, but wrote a dissenting opinion arguing that they could be prosecuted as public officers under the relevant government code section.

“Allowing a social worker to evade liability for falsifying a public document would incentivize social workers to put their own interests in avoiding liability for their misdeeds above the purpose of the state’s child welfare statutory scheme, which is child safety,” Chaney wrote.

“The petitioners’ actions here prevented the system from working in whatever way it might have had they done their jobs honestly, and offers no incentive for either DCFS or individual social workers to work to reform and repair the parts of the system that may fail the children it is intended to protect,” she added. “We have, in effect, encouraged DCFS and its social workers to cover their tracks if they stumble on the cracks in the system.”

Defense attorneys — who argued that the abuse and torture escalated months after a file on Gabriel had been closed and that there was insufficient evidence to take him away from his mother — took their case to the appellate court after Lomeli called the Gabriel’s death “foreseeable” and denied a motion to dismiss the charges against the four.

Previous related stories:

Appeals court won’t re-hear case involving social workers

Appeals panel rules abuse charges must be dismissed against social workers

Judge rejects bid to dismiss charges against social workers in Gabriel Fernandez case

Arraignment postponed for social workers charged in case stemming from Palmdale boy’s death

Social workers accuse DA of criminalizing child welfare work

Four social workers charged in Palmdale boy’s death

Social workers charged: Reaction from “Gabriel’s Justice” founders

County supervisor blasts judge’s ruling on fired DCFS worker

DA to seek death penalty against Palmdale couple in Gabriel’s beating death

L.A. County trying to block return of social worker in Palmdale child abuse death

Accused child killers plead not guilty

Four social workers fired in death of Gabriel

Couple charged with capital murder in death of Palmdale boy

Justice for Gabriel protest, teacher speaks out

Palmdale boy dies after abuse, mother and boyfriend arrested

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home, Los Angeles County, Palmdale

8 comments for "Case expected to be dismissed against social workers charged in Gabriel’s death"

  1. Nicky says

    July 19, 2020 at 8:39 pm

    Everything’s always our fault. Illegal immigrants invade our nation, making a grab for the free stuff. Then, they blame us, for not interceding when they beat their wives and children. Nothing could ever be their fault –

    Reply
    • Citizens behaving badly says

      July 20, 2020 at 7:18 am

      Nicky: It is your fault. U.S. citizens always grasping for free stuff. Look up just how many U.S. citizens beat their wives and children, neglecting, verbally abusing children is our national past time.

      Reply
      • Citizens behaving badly says

        July 20, 2020 at 7:55 am

        Oops, pastime.

        Reply
  2. ANNON says

    July 16, 2020 at 12:51 pm

    So i guess its ok to be an accomplice of murder and get away with it….

    Reply
    • Really? says

      July 16, 2020 at 2:37 pm

      I guess you should read up on the law a bit. They are not an accomplice, by any stretch of the law. Even in the fine state of CA. Did they do their job, no. Did they falsify their records, yes. Did they take part in a murder, no.

      As much as people want to look for someone to blame, look no further than the death penalty and life in prison already handed out. They got the sentence they deserved for their actions. Of course in reality, she will be out in less than 10 years, and he will never see his sentence ever carried out.

      These people should be held accountable for their failure to act, and falsifying their records. Apparently even the law has no real provisions for that.

      Reply
      • Oyuki says

        July 17, 2020 at 3:20 pm

        Falsifying records is being part of it since they were covering up for the monster.

        Reply
        • Stinger says

          July 17, 2020 at 6:04 pm

          An accessory after the fact is not the same as an accomplice to the act.

          That said, I am a bit surprised that the falsification charges didn’t stick. That’s a bad precedent to allow.

          Reply
      • Sweet Talker says

        July 18, 2020 at 11:37 am

        We can thank V Jessie Smith a Palmdale planning Commissioner and Union Rep for getting them off the hook.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • UK Strain on Rising case numbers raise potential for Additional LA County business closures: “Barbara Ferrer should be appointed Surgeon General of the US.” Jan 15, 18:59
  • Struck/Killed on Man struck, killed by car in Lancaster; driver injured: ““…when a pedestrian was walking in the roadway in what appears to be in a westbound direction.” A homeless person…” Jan 15, 18:54
  • Stinger on Readers Speak Out!: “The only one here spreading lies and attempting psy ops (poorly) is you, and everyone knows it (including you).” Jan 15, 18:49
  • Stinger on Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy reported being at Capitol on day of insurrection: “Extraordinary claims require proof. As usual, you have none, because there is none. If there was any, your orange baboon’s…” Jan 15, 18:44
  • AV Illegal on Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy reported being at Capitol on day of insurrection: “You are funny….I know you are in a recreational weed state so I understand. I guess going around an individual…” Jan 15, 18:29

© 2021 · The Antelope Valley Times. All rights reserved. Terms of Use