The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Widow, children of slain firefighter rebut LA County’s lawsuit dismissal bid

by City News Service • December 28, 2022 7 Comments

Tory Carlon [Image via LACFD]
The widow and children of a Los Angeles County Fire Department engineer shot to death by a colleague at the Agua Dulce station in 2021 have responded to a motion by county attorneys to dismiss their case, saying in new court papers that the county and the department were on notice for years of the killer’s violent behavior.

The lawsuit was brought Jan. 21 by Heidi Carlon, who was married to the late 44-year-old Tory Carlon; her adult daughter, Joslyn Carlon; and Heidi Carlon‘s two other daughters, who are both minors, alleging wrongful death, negligence and civil rights violations.

Tory Carlon was working at Station No. 81 on Sierra Highway on June 1, 2021, when 45-year-old Jonathan Patrick Tatone, who also was an engineer but was off duty, arrived and an argument ensued, authorities said. Tatone subsequently shot Carlon, who later died, and county Fire Capt. Arnie Sandoval, who survived. Tatone left for his Acton residence, which he set afire before shooting himself to death. The Carlon family lawsuit names as defendants the county and the estate of Tatone. In her previously filed court papers seeking dismissal of the case, defense attorney Mira Hashmall argues that the county does not have liability due to governmental immunity and workers’ compensation rules. That argument was rebutted in court papers filed Friday, Dec. 23, by the plaintiffs’ attorneys.

“Tatone was an open wound in Fire Station 81, left to fester and infect for years by Los Angeles County Fire Department leadership who chose to ignore, normalize and ratify Tatone’s dangerous conduct,” the Carlon family members’ lawyers argue in their  court papers. “Carlon and others consistently warned the county of Los Angeles that Tatone was unhinged and dangerous.”

Tatone’s superiors, knowing of his dangerous propensities, spoke to him about his threatening behavior toward Carlon, the plaintiffs’ attorneys state in their court papers. Nonetheless, supervisors of Tatone and Carlon assigned the pair to work together regardless of Tatone’s threatening behavior, the Carlon family lawyers further state in their court papers. While at Fire Station 81, Tatone “demonstrated behavior as a loner, as well as an aggressive, angry, irrational, violent individual (who) could not socially adjust with the other firefighters,” the Carlon family attorneys state in their court papers. “Tatone needed an outlet for his anger, and it was Carlon.”

When Carlon tried to appease Tatone by inviting Tatone to his house for a barbecue, Tatone uttered an epithet in front of the other firefighters, the plaintiffs’ attorney state in their court papers. Carlon feared that Tatone would attempt to physically harm him or his family members and began locking the entire house when he left for work, according to the plaintiffs’ attorneys, who further state in their court papers that Carlon would also tell his wife to be careful on Tatone’s days off in fear that Tatone would come and harm Carlon’s family.

“Carlon was so afraid of Tatone that he stopped using the community refrigerator at the fire station and drinking coffee from the community coffee pot out of fear that Tatone would poison his food,” the Carlon family lawyers further state in their court papers.

In her court papers, Hashmall states that while her client “expresses its deepest sympathies to the family of Tory Carlon … this lawsuit does not state any valid claims against the county. The county is not responsible for Tatone’s shooting or Carlon’s death.”

The workers’ compensation process is the exclusive remedy when employees are injured or killed at work, Hashmall argues in her court papers.

“Indeed, Plaintiff Heidi Carlon has already filed a workers’ compensation claim … so she cannot argue that workers’ compensation does not apply,” Hashmall states in her court papers.

Hashmall further states that the county has governmental immunity and that there was “no duty owed to Carlon by the county,” which she maintains defeats the family’s negligence claim. A hearing on the county’s dismissal motion is scheduled for Jan. 9, 2023, before Judge Stephen P. Pfahler.

Hashmall also represented the county in a trial of a lawsuit in which a federal jury awarded Vanessa Bryant $16 million and her co-plaintiff $15 million for mental anguish caused by the actions of first-responders who snapped and shared gruesome photos from the scene of the 2020 helicopter crash that killed Laker legend Kobe Bryant, his 13-year-old daughter and seven other people.

Previous related stories:

LA County seeks dismissal of claims in firefighter widow’s lawsuit

Widow, children of slain firefighter sue LA County, killer’s estate

Slain LACFD engineer’s parents allege wrongful death

As LACoFD mourns death of firefighter, probe continues into shooting motive

–

Filed Under: Acton, Crime/ Safety, Home

7 comments for "Widow, children of slain firefighter rebut LA County’s lawsuit dismissal bid"

  1. John Orr says

    December 31, 2022 at 2:30 pm

    Firemen going postal. What next?

    Reply
    • Raises Hand (2) says

      January 3, 2023 at 12:35 pm

      Postal workers making $270k?

      Reply
  2. Some Brotherhood ... says

    December 30, 2022 at 7:15 am

    Yeah.
    Brothers, in pursuit of $$$$$.
    Otherwise, enemies.

    Reply
  3. John Gage says

    December 29, 2022 at 4:09 pm

    Such a tragic loss of a good family man. LACFD is absolutely responsible.

    The family deserves million$

    Reply
    • Tim Scott says

      December 29, 2022 at 5:41 pm

      I take it you didn’t know him.

      Reply
      • Tim Scott says

        December 30, 2022 at 2:44 pm

        Funny. I know a lot of people who knew him and none of them really have anything good to say about him, and I knew his father, who I would never expect to raise a decent human being.

        Reply
      • Fredsie says

        January 2, 2023 at 4:36 pm

        True. That’s why he’s always on here.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • East Lancaster on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “Judging from your posts, it’s no surprise that you would vote for Rex. Unfortunately, there are a couple thousand others…” Jan 29, 10:19
  • Tim Scott on Siblings of Lancaster woman testify she abused her children: “The court generally doesn’t just hand over the money to ‘the family’ and move on to the next case. When…” Jan 29, 09:25
  • Stinger on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “God is God. Religion is a creation of man. The two do not necessarily intersect.” Jan 29, 09:21
  • Stinger on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “Go Purple!” Jan 29, 09:16
  • Demone boyd on Raising Cane’s is one step closer to new Palmdale location: “Well like to apply” Jan 28, 22:00

Copyright © 2023 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use