The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Judge mulls motion by testing firm pondering lawsuit against Villanueva

by City News Service • March 12, 2022 4 Comments

Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva

Lawyers for a coronavirus testing company asked a judge Friday to allow them to conduct preliminary discovery ahead of the filing of a potential defamation suit against Sheriff Alex Villanueva, but attorneys for the sheriff maintained the firm is trying to harass the sheriff.

Fulgent Genetics Inc. and its subsidiary, Fulgent Therapeutics LLC, allege that Villanueva in a Nov. 29 letter to the Board of Supervisors and published on the sheriff’s department website, falsely stated that the FBI warned him against using Fulgent’s COVID-19 testing services because of “concerning information” that the company would provide to China the DNA data of county employees.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elaine Lu did not immediately rule on Fulgent’s discovery request and took the case under submission.

The letter to the Board of Supervisors referred to an FBI briefing Villanueva said took place the day after Thanksgiving.

In its preliminary discovery petition Jan. 21, Fulgent asks for a court order directing Villanueva to produce any personal and sheriff’s department-issued cellphone text messages and emails related to or discussing Fulgent, the publication of the letter and any involvement he had with the coordination and scheduling of the FBI briefing.

The company also wants Villanueva to sit for a four-hour deposition. Villanueva’s attorneys urged the judge to reject the request by Fulgent and outlined their objections ahead of Friday’s hearing with their court papers.

“The petition is superfluous, pointless and obviously done to harass Sheriff Villanueva,” the sheriff’s attorneys stated in their court papers. “Evidently, petitioners want to waste valuable judicial resources and the parties’ time by filing this petition.”

Villanueva’s lawyers further argue in their court papers that it is “frankly impossible” for Villanueva to be a defendant in a defamation action in his individual capacity because the letter was written on sheriff’s’ department letterhead and was written in response to a mandate by the Board of Supervisors to county department heads to use Fulgent for coronavirus testing purposes.

According to the Fulgent petition, Villanueva made the China claim and other false statements about Fulgent even though the FBI neither accused the company of wrongdoing nor alluded to any evidence that Fulgent provided or would provide private medical information to the Asian nation.

Villanueva’s statements were shared on social media, including those of some anti-vaccine activists, and led to a protest against Fulgent and a window being shot out at the company’s Temple City headquarters, according to the petition.

–

Filed Under: Health, Home, Los Angeles County

4 comments for "Judge mulls motion by testing firm pondering lawsuit against Villanueva"

  1. Yoder says

    March 13, 2022 at 7:02 pm

    The company did, in fact, specifically spell out collection of DNA will be sent to China. Everyone who works for the city of Los Angeles received the information. People don’t read the terms of agreement or fine print because it’s 1,000 pages long. This company is connected to an “insider” that has stake in the very company giving the tests at an inflated cost.

    Reply
    • Stinger says

      March 14, 2022 at 7:59 am

      Odd that they would continue to insist that such isn’t true if it’s actually in their terms of agreement. Where might you have found this?

      Reply
      • Tim Scott says

        March 14, 2022 at 12:57 pm

        More than “odd.” If that was in the terms in any way close to the way it is being presented by Yoder then attorneys for Villanueva would present that to the judge and there would be no “mulling” to be done, the case would have been immediately tossed. There is probably something about DNA collection for research purposes, meaning the DNA is never tied back to identity it is just tabulated against Covid status looking for markers of resistance or susceptibility. The RWNJs and Villanueva will of course take that out of context and try to run with it, but a judge won’t.

        Reply
  2. Tim Scott says

    March 12, 2022 at 2:07 pm

    Let’s see…would Villanueva lie about this “FBI briefing”? Yeah, I believe that he would. By observation Villanueva, much like Donald Trump, says whatever pops into his head that would be useful to him to say, with no regard to truth or facts.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • Mike Mike on Patti LaBelle to perform at Palmdale Amphitheater on July 9: “Well Wendy, if you get hot you can pull your big breast over your head and cool off. Patti is…” May 27, 21:15
  • Edward Pepper on Pedestrian hit, killed on 14 Freeway in Palmdale ID’d: “I knew him as unstable when drinking.” May 27, 20:56
  • I am for the 2nd Amendment on Readers Speak Out! (new): “That is not unreasonable. Good suggestion” May 27, 19:57
  • America's Most Besotted Bumbler on Mail carrier from Palmdale arrested in jobless benefits fraud case: “Non-violent white collar crime ripping off the government rather than an individual, doesn’t seem as punishable to me as violent,…” May 27, 18:38
  • America's Most Deranged Dimwit on Mail carrier from Palmdale arrested in jobless benefits fraud case: ““10% for the big guy.” LOL I’m tall, so I’m gonna have T-shirts made saying that. Maybe I can run…” May 27, 18:30

Copyright © 2022 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use