The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Judge mulls motion by testing firm pondering lawsuit against Villanueva

by City News Service • March 12, 2022

Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva

Lawyers for a coronavirus testing company asked a judge Friday to allow them to conduct preliminary discovery ahead of the filing of a potential defamation suit against Sheriff Alex Villanueva, but attorneys for the sheriff maintained the firm is trying to harass the sheriff.

Fulgent Genetics Inc. and its subsidiary, Fulgent Therapeutics LLC, allege that Villanueva in a Nov. 29 letter to the Board of Supervisors and published on the sheriff’s department website, falsely stated that the FBI warned him against using Fulgent’s COVID-19 testing services because of “concerning information” that the company would provide to China the DNA data of county employees.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elaine Lu did not immediately rule on Fulgent’s discovery request and took the case under submission.

The letter to the Board of Supervisors referred to an FBI briefing Villanueva said took place the day after Thanksgiving.

In its preliminary discovery petition Jan. 21, Fulgent asks for a court order directing Villanueva to produce any personal and sheriff’s department-issued cellphone text messages and emails related to or discussing Fulgent, the publication of the letter and any involvement he had with the coordination and scheduling of the FBI briefing.

The company also wants Villanueva to sit for a four-hour deposition. Villanueva’s attorneys urged the judge to reject the request by Fulgent and outlined their objections ahead of Friday’s hearing with their court papers.

“The petition is superfluous, pointless and obviously done to harass Sheriff Villanueva,” the sheriff’s attorneys stated in their court papers. “Evidently, petitioners want to waste valuable judicial resources and the parties’ time by filing this petition.”

Villanueva’s lawyers further argue in their court papers that it is “frankly impossible” for Villanueva to be a defendant in a defamation action in his individual capacity because the letter was written on sheriff’s’ department letterhead and was written in response to a mandate by the Board of Supervisors to county department heads to use Fulgent for coronavirus testing purposes.

According to the Fulgent petition, Villanueva made the China claim and other false statements about Fulgent even though the FBI neither accused the company of wrongdoing nor alluded to any evidence that Fulgent provided or would provide private medical information to the Asian nation.

Villanueva’s statements were shared on social media, including those of some anti-vaccine activists, and led to a protest against Fulgent and a window being shot out at the company’s Temple City headquarters, according to the petition.

–

Filed Under: Health, Home, Los Angeles County

4 comments for "Judge mulls motion by testing firm pondering lawsuit against Villanueva"

  1. Yoder says

    March 13, 2022 at 7:02 pm

    The company did, in fact, specifically spell out collection of DNA will be sent to China. Everyone who works for the city of Los Angeles received the information. People don’t read the terms of agreement or fine print because it’s 1,000 pages long. This company is connected to an “insider” that has stake in the very company giving the tests at an inflated cost.

    • Stinger says

      March 14, 2022 at 7:59 am

      Odd that they would continue to insist that such isn’t true if it’s actually in their terms of agreement. Where might you have found this?

      • Tim Scott says

        March 14, 2022 at 12:57 pm

        More than “odd.” If that was in the terms in any way close to the way it is being presented by Yoder then attorneys for Villanueva would present that to the judge and there would be no “mulling” to be done, the case would have been immediately tossed. There is probably something about DNA collection for research purposes, meaning the DNA is never tied back to identity it is just tabulated against Covid status looking for markers of resistance or susceptibility. The RWNJs and Villanueva will of course take that out of context and try to run with it, but a judge won’t.

  2. Tim Scott says

    March 12, 2022 at 2:07 pm

    Let’s see…would Villanueva lie about this “FBI briefing”? Yeah, I believe that he would. By observation Villanueva, much like Donald Trump, says whatever pops into his head that would be useful to him to say, with no regard to truth or facts.

Recent Comments

  • Efrem Zimbalist Jr. on Palmdale authorities apprehend graffiti vandals, including armed suspect: “Michelle, have you spoken to the FBI about Rex?” Aug 27, 11:23
  • Frances on Judge orders arbitration of Allied Security guard’s sexual harassment lawsuit: “Does anyone know any more about this case? This is about someone I know and I believe full heartedly that…” Aug 26, 19:42
  • Lily on Palmdale authorities apprehend graffiti vandals, including armed suspect: “@Michelle Egberts… Hi Michelle, remember Jim? Madalyn and Jim were friends of mine.” Aug 23, 06:47
  • Michelle Egberts on Palmdale authorities apprehend graffiti vandals, including armed suspect: “@ Tim Scott… I couldn’t have said it more eloquently Tim!!! We have to get together and catch up over…” Aug 21, 00:58
  • Mars on Palmdale authorities apprehend graffiti vandals, including armed suspect: “Give Them Cleaning Supplies Clean Up The Graffiti For 3 months Also Have Them Do Community Service As Well Then…” Aug 15, 02:54

Copyright © 2024 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use

Dear Readers,

After more than a decade of serving the Antelope Valley, we have made the difficult decision to close The Antelope Valley Times. The site will no longer be updated, but all past articles will remain accessible. Thank you for your loyalty and support over the years.

—The AV Times Staff