The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

U.S. Supreme Court lets stand $4 million award to Lancaster couple

by City News Service • March 5, 2019

[Screenshots of the couple taken from footage of a 2013 interview with NBC Los Angeles]
LANCASTER – The U.S. Supreme Court Monday let stand a nearly $4 million award to a formerly homeless Lancaster couple for a raid by Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies that caused the man to lose a leg.

In declining to take up the case involving Angel and Jennifer Mendez, the nation’s highest court upheld an appellate panel’s finding that the deputies were liable for the warrantless raid while searching for a parolee-at- large.

Angel Mendez and his wife sued Los Angeles County eight years ago, alleging excessive force and federal civil rights violations.

The couple were living in a makeshift dwelling in 2010 when they were shot by Deputies Christopher Conley and Jennifer Pederson, members of the Community-Oriented Policing Unit. Mendez, who was holding a rifle-style BB gun, was critically injured, resulting in the amputation of one of his legs. His wife, who was pregnant at the time, was struck once by a bullet, which shattered her collar bone. [ View video footage shot by LASD immediately after the shooting incident here.]

U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald handed down his ruling for the plaintiffs in Los Angeles federal court in August 2013, awarding $3.8 million to Mendez and $222,000 to his wife, for damages resulting from Fourth Amendment violations by the deputies.

The deputies appealed to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, unsuccessfully arguing that the dilapidated wooden shack did not appear to be a residence and consequently a warrant was not required.

Affirming Fitzgerald’s finding, the appellate panel determined that the deputies should have known that the shack was occupied, since it was “surrounded by an air conditioning unit, electric cord, water hose, and clothes locker.”

County lawyers then appealed to the Supreme Court, which overturned the appellate ruling. [Read more here.]

However, the 9th Circuit upheld the ruling last year, again finding the deputies liable. This time, the Supreme Court declined without comment to consider a further appeal.

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home, Lancaster

10 comments for "U.S. Supreme Court lets stand $4 million award to Lancaster couple"

  1. Homeowners says

    March 15, 2019 at 8:18 am

    Most homelessness is caused by low intellect, emotional and mental problems and it is not laziness

  2. Alby says

    March 14, 2019 at 7:27 pm

    Good idea… owning a rifle style bb gun in your homeless encampment to hunt rabbits or birds for food. Bad idea… holding a rifle style bb gun in front of a trained itchy-fingered cop. Better idea… elimitating homless encampments that smell like feces and hepatitis.

  3. Alby says

    March 7, 2019 at 8:32 pm

    Why was he holding a rifle style bb gun in front of the cops?

    • Jacuff says

      March 15, 2019 at 8:12 am

      When homeless usually you lack intellectual analysis and reasoning this is why they are homless

  4. Alexis says

    March 6, 2019 at 5:39 am

    Law Enforcement? Lawless Enforcement! Good for you, Angel and Jennifer Mendez! Warrant less raids, fabricating evidence, etc. This is why the trust is gone between many citizens, and so called peace officers.

  5. Surfside 6 says

    March 5, 2019 at 7:28 pm

    Keep the payouts coming! There’s still a few taxpayers that haven’t fled the state yet…

    • Tim Scott says

      March 6, 2019 at 12:05 am

      Yeah, you should probably move to one of those states where they just shrug when the cops shoot unarmed people so we can hope that it happens to you.

  6. Warrantless Raid says

    March 5, 2019 at 2:56 pm

    The plaintiff$ won’t be homeless anymore.

  7. Dave Hoffmeyer says

    March 5, 2019 at 1:16 pm

    Good to hear, congratulations Angel and Jen hope you finally get your settlement.

  8. Jason Zink says

    March 5, 2019 at 10:14 am

    Right decision. Easy decision. The County should of never appealed it to the Supreme Court. Wasted a million dollars in attorney fees (tax dollars) fighting a case that should of been paid to the victims years ago.

Recent Comments

  • Tim Scott on Op-ed: Gascón’s recent statements are 100% false: “Do these corrupt ADAs EVER get tired of vomiting out these screeds?” Jun 24, 21:11
  • Tim Scott on Family urges judge not to reverse convicted killer’s death sentence: “Make me, clown. Or be like Mike and type big while packing a pair of BBs.” Jun 24, 20:37
  • Tim Scott on Family urges judge not to reverse convicted killer’s death sentence: “You think someone in prison is in any position to defend themselves? How out of touch with reality are you?…” Jun 24, 20:35
  • Fred on Family urges judge not to reverse convicted killer’s death sentence: “Youand oracle boy can have 500 shots if it helps you two skeeters focus on the actual topic..thaaaanx” Jun 24, 18:02
  • Fred on Family urges judge not to reverse convicted killer’s death sentence: “The irony underwhelms.” Jun 24, 17:59

Copyright © 2022 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use