{"id":104967,"date":"2021-11-05T08:00:20","date_gmt":"2021-11-05T15:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/?p=104967"},"modified":"2021-11-05T08:48:24","modified_gmt":"2021-11-05T15:48:24","slug":"judge-dismisses-deputys-retaliation-suit-against-los-angeles-county","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/2021\/11\/05\/judge-dismisses-deputys-retaliation-suit-against-los-angeles-county\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge dismisses deputy’s retaliation suit against Los Angeles County"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A judge Thursday dismissed a lawsuit he had reinstated in March in which a Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy alleged the department put his life in danger when he reported the activities of an alleged deputy subgroup known as the Executioners.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William F. Fahey had previously tossed Austreberto “Art” Gonzalez’s<\/strong> lawsuit on procedural grounds on Feb. 9.\u00a0However, Gonzalez’s attorney, Alan Romero, moved to have the case revived, saying Fahey’s previous ruling had nothing to do with the substance of the case. Fahey reinstated the case in March.<\/p>\n

“The court struck our complaint and entered a dismissal because we filed an amended complaint while a demurrer was pending,” Romero said previously.<\/p>\n

Lawyers for Los Angeles County subsequently filed a second motion to dismiss the case in July, arguing there were no triable issues. Judge Fahey agreed and also assessed the plaintiff’s side $2,000, saying he was doing so to compensate the county for its share of a non-refundable mediation fee after the plaintiff’s attorneys canceled the session.<\/p>\n

According to the original suit Gonzalez filed in September 2020, the decorated Marine Corps combat veteran called an anonymous tip line in February 2020 to report the “criminal activities of a deputy gang at Compton Station which existed to violate the rights of the public and other sheriff’s department employees.”<\/p>\n

The department turned over a recording of Gonzalez’s call to the gang, placing the plaintiff in danger, and “took zero steps to curtail the deputy gang,” according to the suit.\u00a0In March 2020, Gonzalez was passed over for a watch deputy position that was instead given to an Executioners “prospect” in violation of county policy, the suit stated. That same month, a sergeant forced Gonzalez to resign from his field training officer job, according to the suit.<\/p>\n

Fearing for his safety and aware of a violent attack by the gang on another station deputy, Gonzalez contacted an attorney to represent him in his disputes with the department, according to his lawsuit.<\/p>\n

Attorneys for the county argued in their court papers that there was no evidence the county retaliated against Gonzalez. They said he asked to take time off from his role as a field training officer and to transfer from the Compton station and that both requests were accommodated. They also said he suffered no economic damages.<\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A judge Thursday dismissed a lawsuit he had reinstated in March in which a Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy alleged the department put his life in danger when he reported the activities of an alleged deputy subgroup known as the Executioners. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William F. Fahey had previously tossed Austreberto “Art” Gonzalez’s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":70,"featured_media":97692,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[719,1499,1496],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104967"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/70"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104967"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":104968,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104967\/revisions\/104968"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/97692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theavtimes.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}