The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Ca. Supreme Court won’t review case in triple-fatal Lancaster crash

by City News Service • September 21, 2022

[Inset] Crash victims Yovany Salazar Calzada, his wife Rocio Perez Lopez, and his grandmother Virginia Martinez. [Main image] Collision scene on Jan. 11, 2018.
The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday, Sept. 21, to review the case of a young man convicted of second-degree murder for a 2018 crash that killed three people at a Lancaster intersection.

Davion Murphy, now 23, was convicted in March 2020 of three counts of second-degree murder stemming from the Jan. 11, 2018, collision at the corner of Avenue J-8 and Challenger Way that killed Yovany Salazar Calzada, 23, Rocio Perez Lopez, 26, and Calzada’s grandmother, Virginia Martinez, 61.

Murphy — whose three passengers survived the collision — went through a red light in his silver Lexus and struck the driver’s side of the Subaru WRX containing the victims, according to Deputy District Attorney Casey Higgins. In June, a three-justice panel from California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal concluded that “sufficient evidence supported the jury’s verdict.”

“Although there is not yet a commonly administered and standardized medical test equivalent to the blood alcohol concentration test that accurately determines a person’s level of impairment from lipophilic, psychoactive drugs such as marijuana, there was substantial evidence that at the time of the accident Murphy was impaired from using marijuana,” the appellate court panel found in its 30-page ruling June 30.

“There was also substantial evidence that Murphy acted with implied malice both when he smoked marijuana with the intent to drive, and when he drove in a manner that demonstrated a conscious disregard for human life,” the panel found.

Eyewitness accounts and physical evidence from the accident scene demonstrated that Murphy drove through a red light at a speed of 88.1 mph — more than 48 mph over the applicable speed limit — in a residential neighborhood without braking or honking the car horn, the justices noted in their opinion.

Instructors at his youth educational program had shared personal accounts about the dangers of driving while under the influence of alcohol and drugs, and Murphy had signed a driver’s license application affirming that he had been advised that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs could lead to a murder charge, according to the appellate court panel’s ruling.

Murphy also had a marijuana container in his car that was labeled with a specific warning against driving under the influence of marijuana, the justices added. Murphy has been behind bars since his November 2018 arrest, and was sentenced in July 2020 to 15 years to life in state prison.

Previous related stories:

Man’s conviction upheld for Lancaster crash that killed 3

Man sentenced to 15-year-to-life term for crash that killed 3 in Lancaster

Man convicted of murder in Lancaster crash that killed three

Alleged drugged driver charged for triple fatal crash in Lancaster

 3 killed, 4 injured in Lancaster traffic crash 

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home, Lancaster

5 comments for "Ca. Supreme Court won’t review case in triple-fatal Lancaster crash"

  1. Cleo Watts says

    September 29, 2022 at 4:27 pm

    Yeah Tim Scott (aka fool), the dude was high as a kite on weed and was driving almost 50 miles over the posted speed limit. Oh and he flew threw a red light-case closed. Libtard.

    • Tim Scott says

      September 29, 2022 at 5:06 pm

      And you think that means we should just say ” no appeal on this case”? Please lay out the criteria for “no appeal” that you would like to see made into law.

  2. Justice says

    September 22, 2022 at 5:33 pm

    This case should have never gone to the California Supreme Court.

    • Tim Scott says

      September 22, 2022 at 5:45 pm

      Are you opposing the right to appeal in general, or is there something unique about this case?

  3. Kiki says

    September 22, 2022 at 8:30 am

    Keep him locked up so he can’t harm anymore innocent people he is a selfish person .

Recent Comments

  • Traffic Investigation on Pedestrian killed after being hit by semi in Palmdale: “Suicide.” Jun 7, 23:28
  • Greetings from the armargosa on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “I do this every once in a while to hope that your heart blows out of your chest… By your…” Jun 7, 16:59
  • Damien Willy’s daddy on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “3 – 0 You lose… Obviously you can’t have any cause nobody gave you one for the 76 years of…” Jun 7, 16:56
  • Mr. Sulu (2 birds/1 stone) on LA County Board OKs creation of LGBTQ+ commission: “Doesn’t numbnutz Wrecks know that Asians and Gays are targets for the white christian nationalists that infest Lancaster? Why would…” Jun 7, 14:56
  • Mayors Say the Darndest Things on LA County Board OKs creation of LGBTQ+ commission: “Good things happen when you’re able to increase your Asian population to a certain threshold: Crime rates go down, education…” Jun 7, 14:21

Copyright © 2023 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use