The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Gov. Newsom signs gun control legislation modeled after Texas abortion law

by City News Service • July 22, 2022 8 Comments

[Image via Twitter, Office of the Governor of California, @CAgovernor] View video of the July 22, 2022 press conference below.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed gun control legislation Friday, July 22, that allows private citizens to sue those who provide or manufacture illegal firearms in California, including assault weapons and so-called ghost guns.

The law, which will take effect in January, was modeled after Texas’ abortion law that allows people to sue anyone who aids or abets in an abortion. Like in the Texas bill, people will receive at least $10,000 in damages for each weapon, plus attorneys fees. Senate Bill 1327, introduced by state Sens. Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Anthony Portantino, D-La Cañada Flintridge, was designed to mimic Texas’ measure so that the Supreme Court — which upheld Texas’ law last year — would also have to strike down Texas’ legislation if it were to overturn the California law.

Newsom said at a news conference Friday that he expects the law to be litigated in the Supreme Court, which has been sympathetic to gun rights in recent rulings.

“The Supreme Court opened the door,” Newsom said. “The Supreme Court said this was OK. It was a terrible decision. But these are the rules that they have established.”

Newsom believes there is “no principled way” that the court could overturn SB 1327 without also striking down Texas’ law.

“If they’re going to use this framework to put women’s rights at risk, we’re going to use it to save people’s lives in the state of California,” Newsom said. “That’s the spirit, the principle behind this law.”

The governor acknowledged critics who have pointed out that he criticized both the Texas law and the Supreme Court decision to uphold it, that when “they go low, you go high.” Newsom said that Democrats are not making “demonstrable progress” on gun control despite calls for stricter legislation following a slew of recent mass shootings.

“Right now, if you look at what’s going on across this country, we’re not winning,” Newsom said.

Sam Paredes, the executive director of Gun Owners of California, told the Los Angeles Times that the legislation is a “retaliation against lawful gun owners and the court because of the Texas decision,” and that the bill’s authors are being “vindictive.” Paredes said that the firearms industry will have a “strong reaction” to the bill going into law, according to the Times.

Proponents hailed the bill as a major step toward removing assault weapons and ghost guns from California streets, with Newsom calling it “the most impactful thing we’ve done in decades in the state of California to advance our efforts in gun safety.”

Ghost guns — which are unlicensed and can be self-assembled — were used during a 2013 shooting at Santa Monica College in which six people, including the shooter, died; a series of shootings in Tehama County in 2017, in which five people died; and the 2019 shooting at Saugus High School in 2019, in which three students, including the shooter, were killed and three others were injured.

“For the sake of our children, this is a common-sense step toward ensuring California streets, schools and communities continue to be among the safest in the nation,” Hertzberg said in a statement. “If Texas is going to use this legal framework to essentially outlaw abortion and harm women, all with the Supreme Court’s blessing, California is going to use it to save lives and take AR15s off our streets.”

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home, Politics

8 comments for "Gov. Newsom signs gun control legislation modeled after Texas abortion law"

  1. Frank Rizzo says

    July 24, 2022 at 7:41 am

    You can file a lawsuit and sue for anything already, this “legislation” is nonsense. The governor is a tool. He could be working to lower taxes etc but political grandstanding is more important in CA.

    Reply
    • Tim Scott says

      July 24, 2022 at 10:40 am

      This comment shows that you are misinformed on so many levels…

      Reply
  2. How far we’ve fallen says

    July 23, 2022 at 7:17 pm

    Tim Scott, some education, mostly bot. Marshall on shepherd of the ignorant.

    Reply
  3. ACE says

    July 23, 2022 at 2:48 am

    I FOLLOW MEXICO NEWS AND READ FREQUETLY OF MASS KILLINGS IN BARS AND ON THE BEACHES OF CANCUN…

    I USED TO HUNT IN MEXICO WITH SHOTGUNS BUT AM AFRAID TO GO THERE NOW FOR ANY REASON…

    THE CROOKS IN THE INTERIOR KIDNAP HEALTHY TEENAGERS FOR OGRAN TRANSPLANTS FOR RICH GRINGOS…

    THE COPS BEND TO THE LEAD OR GOLD CARTEL MANDATES AND ARE CROOKS THEMSELVES…

    THE MEXICAN NAVY IS THE ENFORCEMENT ARM OF MEXICO NOW…

    THE PRIVATE PEOPLE CANNOT OWN GUNS OR AMMO…

    STAY AWAY FROM MEXICO IF YOU VALUE YOUR LIFE FOLKS…

    ***

    Reply
  4. ACE says

    July 22, 2022 at 6:36 pm

    MEXICO HAS ABSOLUTE GUN CONTROL…

    JUST LOOK HOW SAFE IT IS THERE AS A RESULT…

    ***

    Reply
    • Tim Scott says

      July 22, 2022 at 7:00 pm

      Unlike the US, almost all gun violence in Mexico is related to competition between criminal enterprises. They don’t get schoolkids mowed down wholesale, or shot down watching parades, or in malls.

      Reply
      • SB says

        July 24, 2022 at 11:59 am

        “ competition between criminal enterprises”

        And killing law enforcement that can’t be bribed and corrupted

        Reply
  5. Tim Scott says

    July 22, 2022 at 3:40 pm

    This:

    “Newsom believes there is “no principled way” that the court could overturn SB 1327 without also striking down Texas’ law.”

    …unfortunately relies on the idea that the current GOP appointed justices have principles when they demonstrably do not.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • Donald Trump on Readers Speak Out! (July 2022): “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” Aug 10, 09:00
  • America's Most Says Deal Me Out on Readers Speak Out! (July 2022): “Always had respect for FBI under J. Edgar Hoover, but the current corruption, incompetence and partisan weaponization of our leading…” Aug 10, 08:53
  • Tim Scott on Readers Speak Out! (July 2022): “They openly said that any prosecution of Trump would justify a civil war.” Aug 10, 08:52
  • Tim Scott on Readers Speak Out! (July 2022): “No stupid, you were watching Trumpist agitators that had no business being there being kept out. The designated poll workers,…” Aug 10, 08:49
  • Tim Scott on Readers Speak Out! (July 2022): “Not everyone that voted for him will answer his call to arms.” Aug 10, 08:46

Copyright © 2022 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use