The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Op-ed: Dear Hollywood, depict animal control officers as they are

by Opinion • April 22, 2022

By Marcia Mayeda
Director, Animal Care & Control for Los Angeles County

Animals are a beloved and popular topic for film and television because they provide heartwarming stories and highlight the intrinsic reward of the human-animal bond. Many wonderful TV shows and films have helped elevate the public’s awareness of kindness towards animals, how to care for them, and the importance of protecting them in our society. Keeping animals in the forefront of peoples’ minds is a good thing.

However, my toes curl and my blood pressure rises when I see the incredibly offensive and inaccurate depictions of animal control officers in these forms of entertainment. I did a quick internet search of “dogcatcher movie” and was stunned by the number of films that include the dogcatcher as the evil villain, going back to the early 1900’s!

Even the term “dogcatcher” is a derogatory and outdated label; the proper term is animal control officer (ACO), humane officer, or similar professional title. In film and television ACOs are universally depicted as mean, animal-hating, incompetent buffoons. These caricatures in no way accurately depict the hard working, compassionate, and dedicated women and men that have chosen this career because they believe deeply in helping animals and the people who care about them.

ACOs work at all hours of the day, in all sorts of weather, to protect and save animals in need. It is a physically challenging and emotionally taxing profession that garners modest pay and few accolades from the public, especially thanks to the portrayal of ACOs in entertainment. The reality of ACO work is a far cry from its false depiction.

ACOs investigate animal cruelty and neglect, removing animals from inhumane and abusive situations. They capture dangerous dogs that pose a danger to people and other animals, preventing severe attacks and deaths. ACOs investigate dangerous and vicious dog cases and brings these cases for administrative or judicial review to place restrictions over keeping such animals.

ACOs are mandated reporters of child, elder, and dependent-adult abuse. Many times DACC ACOs have responded to calls of animal neglect only to find humans at great risk as well. Our officers have, on countless occasions, obtained help for vulnerable humans from law enforcement or social services agencies.

ACOs respond during wildfires or other emergencies, working in dangerous conditions to rescue the pets and livestock left behind by evacuated residents. These animals are transported to safe temporary sheltering while DACC provides care for them until they can be reunited with their owners.

ACOs enforce animal licensing and rabies laws. Rabies is almost 100% fatal, an excruciatingly painful death that is almost eradicated in the United States thanks to pet rabies vaccination and licensing programs. Ensuring compliance with these laws has made our nation safer and healthier.

ACOs enforce other important laws as well. These include mandatory spay/neuter laws to reduce pet overpopulation and euthanasia; microchip laws to ensure pets have permanent identification in case they are separated from their families; and the safety of animals in animal-related business such as pet stores, grooming facilities, boarding kennels, and more. ACOs regularly assist law enforcement officers in serving search warrants or securing animals so police and sheriff are not harmed by animals on the property.

Hollywood, I understand that a story needs a good villain. Can’t you do better? I’m sure your creative writers can come up with better bad guys than the tired old trope of the dogcatcher. How about dogfighters (dog fighting is a felony and a brutal, vicious activity in which animals suffer horribly). How about cockfighters? That, too, is a crime and is prevalent in many parts of the country. Dognappers are good villains – we have all heard the heartbreaking and frightening media stories of people being shot or assaulted while their beloved pets were stolen from them.

In all these cases the ACO is a hero – the officer breaking up an illegal animal fight; the officer who finds the kidnapped dog, scans it for its microchip and returns it to its family; the officer rescuing horses from a burning barn; or the officer who sees that an abused elder and her pet receive the services and care they need.

In fact, the State of California recognizes the importance and value of ACOs through the State-designated Certified Animal Control Officer (CACO) program. ACOs must complete rigorous training and experience to obtain CACO certification and maintain their status through regular trainings. There are more than 300 CACOs in California, and about 50 of those work for DACC.

Please join me in thanking our ACOs for their dedication, compassion, and bravery. Hollywood, please continue this tribute by depicting ACOs as the true professionals they are.

About the author: Marcia Mayeda has been the Director of Animal Care and Control for the County of Los Angeles since July 2001. Subscribe to her blog at: https://animalcare.lacounty.gov/directors_blog/

–

Filed Under: Opinion

5 comments for "Op-ed: Dear Hollywood, depict animal control officers as they are"

  1. Manny says

    April 25, 2022 at 10:05 am

    AOC officers are , basically, social service workers for animals who cannot defend themselves nor reports neglect or mistreatment.

    They are wonderful people doing a job no one wants and for unfortunate low salary. We need them and cant go without them.

  2. GVE says

    April 25, 2022 at 6:29 am

    I love our DACC officers, but I do have a complaint that we cannot seem to get addressed. You specifically said “the officer who finds the kidnapped dog, scans it for it’s microchip and returns it to its family.” THIS IS NOT TRUE. We have a member of our Local Lost and Found page who reached out for help for a dog that was removed from the property where it lived with her father who was dying in the hospital. The dog was removed without permission and it is microchipped, registered in her name, she knows the person who is holding her families dog hostage. Her father consequently died in the hospital. We reached out to Animal control and they said its a civil matter. The owner filed a police report, has filed a civil court case and we have the specific address of the person where the dog is and still Lancaster animal control refuses to help or even go out to the property, scan the dog, ask for proof of ownership, and get the dog back. The owner even has video of of her going to their property with police report in hand and the thieves screaming at her to get off the property she is not getting her dog back. Animal control says it is a civil matter – so you mislead the public when you make claims that a microchipped dog is easy to get back….not if the AC officers in that jurisdiction refuse to make an effort, and since a stolen dog is not at the top of the Sheriffs stolen property list – it looks like this person will have all the time in the world to harm the dog while the civil matter makes it’s way though the court system.

  3. Ledesma 99 says

    April 22, 2022 at 6:38 pm

    They’re usually wonderful people. But they need to lighten up on Coyotes. Coyotes are nothing but another kind of dog. If Coyotes are vicious it’s only because they are starving! And many Coyotes have little puppies depending on them. Establish a “donation” pit outside town and animal lovers will do the rest. After that, if a Coyote comes to town it won’t be to attack somebody’s dog, but instead to take their dog out on a date!

    • Manny says

      April 25, 2022 at 10:08 am

      I agree. Coyotes are dogs. No reason for anyone to treat them badly. They are usually thirsty and hungry.

      • FWB says

        April 26, 2022 at 5:44 pm

        They are wild animals and should not be fed or petted.

        Providing water for wildlife is good

        Feeding wildlife is bad

Recent Comments

  • Plato on Mother of deputy shot to death in Palmdale calls DA’s decision a ‘disgrace’: “Honestly, if I were this kids relative, I would not make a media circus of his death in the line…” Sep 29, 07:17
  • Adam Smith on Supervisors OK $15.6M state grant for LASD to fight retail theft: “Hmmm. A grant to do what your already supposed to be doing… Definitely a big govt move… ‘more money down…” Sep 28, 18:38
  • Tim Scott on Mother of deputy shot to death in Palmdale calls DA’s decision a ‘disgrace’: “Do you recognize that we had the death penalty for decades and it apparently did nothing to keep “maniacs” from…” Sep 28, 17:37
  • John on Mother of deputy shot to death in Palmdale calls DA’s decision a ‘disgrace’: “Can’t do that if maniacs keep on coming out. That a reasonable answer you have, but we are not dealing…” Sep 28, 15:39
  • John on Mother of deputy shot to death in Palmdale calls DA’s decision a ‘disgrace’: “Who cares. People like that don’t deserve to be here if they’re taking life, especially those who are out there…” Sep 28, 15:38

Copyright © 2023 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use