The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

13 people arrested, 114 firearms seized in LA County sweep

by The AV Times Staff • February 22, 2022 7 Comments

[Image via California Department of Justice.]
A five-day sweep to remove guns from people legally barred from possessing them in Los Angeles County resulted in 13 arrests and the seizure of 114 firearms, the California Department of Justice announced Tuesday.

The seizures included assault weapons, “ghost guns,” handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Also seized were more than 49,000 rounds of ammunition and 87 high-capacity magazines, authorities said.

Agents from the DOJ’s Bureau of Firearms partnered with personnel from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the Los Angeles County Probation Department, and officers from multiple police departments, according to a news release from the California Department of Justice.

The sweep targeted people who are prohibited from possessing firearms under the DOJ’s Armed and Prohibited Persons System, Attorney General Rob Bonta said.

“California’s Armed and Prohibited Persons System is a critical tool that makes the work of cracking down on illegal gun ownership and possession possible,” Bonta said. “… Collaborative efforts like these increase our success in taking guns out of potentially dangerous hands, reducing gun violence, and keeping our neighborhoods safe,” he added.

In 2006, California became the only state in the nation to establish a system for tracking firearm owners who fall into a prohibited status. The APPS database works to identify individuals who lawfully procured firearms and later became prohibited from owning or possessing them. In general, prohibited persons in APPS include individuals who were convicted of a felony or a violent misdemeanor, were placed under a domestic violence or other restraining order, or suffer from serious mental illness.

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home, Los Angeles County

7 comments for "13 people arrested, 114 firearms seized in LA County sweep"

  1. Mike says

    February 24, 2022 at 6:15 am

    These red flag laws are unconstitutional and were cited as legally questionable in a recent second amendment ruling by the US Supreme Court. The truth is, the second amendment exists to repel a tyrannical government and that’s why they want your guns folks.

    Reply
    • Tim Scott says

      February 24, 2022 at 9:58 am

      The second amendment calls for a well regulated militia. It was Scalia that interpreted that to mean “any dingbat can have a gun.” Pretty funny, since he claimed to be an originalist.

      Reply
      • America's Most Dingbat With a Gun says

        February 24, 2022 at 11:08 am

        Thank heaven for Scalia.

        BTW: This Spring SCOTUS will take up a case that determines if sheriffs can deny CCW permits in LA County, SF, etc. Imagine if hundreds of thousands of citizens start carrying. Crime would drop dramatically.

        Reply
        • Tim Scott says

          February 24, 2022 at 12:15 pm

          A bunch of armed dingbats running around is likely to increase crime, particularly crimes of violence.

          Reply
          • America's Most Delirious & Delusional says

            February 24, 2022 at 12:22 pm

            It might be like “The Purge” everyday and I’d never come out of my house. But it might ease the housing shortage (that’s cold and I’m ashamed of myself).

  2. Sweep says

    February 22, 2022 at 7:20 pm

    This is more of a PR stunt than anything else.

    Reply
  3. Tim Scott says

    February 22, 2022 at 2:39 pm

    I’d be interested in the process here. The combination of “registered buying a firearm” followed later by “became ineligible to buy or own a firearm” is all well and good, but did a judge issue search warrants for these people’s homes based on just that? Seems a stretch, to say the least.

    If that’s how this works it would be interesting to know how many of these warrants end up in the flip side, with some guy that no longer has a gun and is minding their own business getting a shock and awe visit from the stormtroopers.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Tim Scott Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • Sonya on Op-ed: Gascón’s recent statements are 100% false: “And the result of it is more people dead, Almost 100% more people dead. https://abc7.com/los-angeles-county-crime-statistics-homicide-murder/11489644/” Jun 30, 12:33
  • Sonya on Op-ed: Gascón’s recent statements are 100% false: “Another word salad extravaganza brought to you by AV times resident self absorbed nerd who looks down his nose upon…” Jun 30, 12:30
  • Esther Cabrera on LA County aims assist property owners affected by eviction moratorium: “I would like to know more about the foreclosures” Jun 30, 12:25
  • Clueless on “4th of July Field Day” at Domenic Massari and Marie Kerr Parks: “Yes, that’s why I stopped going to movies. All the years and months of preparation in writing, casting, and filming…” Jun 30, 10:01
  • Alby on Newsom joins Oregon, Washington in pact to ensure abortion access: “Says, the anticipating reader…. No John… No.” Jun 30, 09:05

Copyright © 2022 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use