The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Restaurant owners who challenged indoor dining ban drop legal action

by The AV Times Staff • January 29, 2022 3 Comments

Three owners of dine-in restaurants in Los Angeles County who filed a legal action demanding compensation for revenue losses when indoor dining was prohibited under coronavirus restrictions have dropped their case.

In their petition filed last April 12, petitioners James P. Trani, Steve Patrick and John Marvoich named as respondents the state of California and Los Angeles County. The three businessmen alleged the forced closures amounted to a government taking and violating their rights of free speech and assembly. Their court papers did not name the restaurants they own.

In October, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Jon R. Takasugi granted a motion by the Attorney General’s Office to dismiss the state as a party, saying the restaurant owners had “not submitted any facts which could show that state defendants commandeered or utilized any personal property. In fact, plaintiffs allege that they continued to operate their restaurants as take-out restaurants, albeit with less business.”

Two months later, the judge found the county was not properly served with the petition and quashed service. Then, on Thursday, Jan. 27, the restaurant owners’ lawyer, James Otto, filed court papers with the judge asking that the remainder of the case be dismissed. No reason was given for the businessmen’s’ decision.

According to the petition, the ban on indoor dining was “an irrational and unnecessary order to stop the spread of the COVID-19 virus by punishing the irrelevant plaintiffs who are virus-free and pose absolutely no risk of spreading the virus.” The restaurant owners maintained the shutdown was “not rationally related to a or any governmental interest as it was unsupported by any evidence and defined logic, nature, and/or common sense.”

Before the closures, Trani operated his restaurant at a profit for 30 years, while Marvoich’s eatery was in the black for 20 years and Patrick’s for 11 years, the petition stated. Their businesses have never been the source of the COVID-19 or any other virus, the petition stated.

–

Filed Under: Business, Health, Home, Los Angeles County

3 comments for "Restaurant owners who challenged indoor dining ban drop legal action"

  1. FWB says

    January 31, 2022 at 8:39 am

    Restaurant owners who do not push back do not get my business.

    Reply
    • Tim Scott says

      January 31, 2022 at 12:41 pm

      Restaurant owners with a demonstrated lack of interest in maintaining public health should be out of business.

      Reply
  2. Arthur Rubin says

    January 30, 2022 at 5:28 pm

    It may be not be legal grounds, but it is certainly true that the ban on indoor dining is not rationally related to any government interest.

    There seems to be no legal requirement that government actions be rationally related to any government interest.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • Mike Mike on Patti LaBelle to perform at Palmdale Amphitheater on July 9: “Well Wendy, if you get hot you can pull your big breast over your head and cool off. Patti is…” May 27, 21:15
  • Edward Pepper on Pedestrian hit, killed on 14 Freeway in Palmdale ID’d: “I knew him as unstable when drinking.” May 27, 20:56
  • I am for the 2nd Amendment on Readers Speak Out! (new): “That is not unreasonable. Good suggestion” May 27, 19:57
  • America's Most Besotted Bumbler on Mail carrier from Palmdale arrested in jobless benefits fraud case: “Non-violent white collar crime ripping off the government rather than an individual, doesn’t seem as punishable to me as violent,…” May 27, 18:38
  • America's Most Deranged Dimwit on Mail carrier from Palmdale arrested in jobless benefits fraud case: ““10% for the big guy.” LOL I’m tall, so I’m gonna have T-shirts made saying that. Maybe I can run…” May 27, 18:30

Copyright © 2022 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use