The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

LA County defends COVID vaccine mandate amid deputies’ legal challenge

by City News Service • December 7, 2021

Los Angeles County Tuesday defended its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for employees in the wake of a petition filed by the union representing Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies, which asks a judge to declare that the Board of Supervisors lacks legal authority to suspend or fire deputies for noncompliance.

While declining to comment on the court action, a representative for the county said extensive steps have been taken during the pandemic “to keep the public and employees safe and the vaccination policy is an essential public health measure intended to protect employees and the public we serve.”

The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs brought the petition Friday, Dec. 3, in Los Angeles Superior Court, also seeking an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On Aug. 4, the Board of Supervisors established a mandatory vaccination policy requiring all county employees, including those employed by the sheriff’s department, to be fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The board maintains it has the legal authority to subject those failing to comply to disciplinary action, including being fired.

But according to the union’s suit, that disciplinary power rests exclusively with the sheriff — and the current holder of that office, Alex Villanueva, has said he will not enforce the county’s vaccination policy due to the adverse impact on his ability to ensure public safety.

“Thus, the parties are in fundamental disagreement as to whether the county, acting through its Board of Supervisors, may impose disciplinary action on department employees,” the suit states.

“It is imperative for ALADS and its represented employees to obtain the instant declaratory relief so that such represented employees may govern their conduct accordingly.”

Previous related story: LASD union lawsuit says supervisors lack authority to discipline unvaccinated employees

–

Filed Under: Crime/ Safety, Home

Recent Comments

  • Concerned citizen on Motorcyclist killed in Lancaster traffic collision, driver arrested for DUI: “Obviously you are a habitual drunk driver if you are advocating for drunk drivers. What a shame! It doesn’t matter…” Jun 10, 09:36
  • Immanuel Can't (misspelled on purpose) on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “oh, yeah…. what is a citizen without equity called… W84ITT a slave” Jun 10, 09:12
  • Demosthenes on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “‘Equity’ and ‘Equality’ – agreed – are two very different things. “Equity” is a piece of the action, skin in…” Jun 10, 09:08
  • Eric Cartman on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “Indictment – good Incarceration – even better” Jun 10, 08:58
  • Roger "Turbulent" Waters on Readers Speak Out! (January 2023): “I am afraid that merely repeating a postulation is nto the same as proving it. all existing models … [the…” Jun 10, 08:55

Copyright © 2023 · The AV Times LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use