LOS ANGELES – The five elected officials who govern Los Angeles County Tuesday approved $460 million in Measure H spending on homelessness, increasing their commitment to the problem in the face of a widely anticipated rise in the numbers of people without a permanent home.
Prior to the vote, the Board of Supervisors gathered on the steps of the downtown Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration to underline the county’s determination to find permanent solutions for thousands of people living in encampments on city streets and empty lots.
“The scale of this crisis is overwhelming,” Supervisor Janice Hahn said. “We cannot and will not accept this as the new normal.”
The results of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority point-in-time count of homelessness will not be publicly available until May 31, but all indications are that the trend will be up, perhaps dramatically.
“This is a deepening and dynamic crisis,” Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas said. “We are contending with serious head winds that threaten to hinder our progress, but we will not be deterred.”
Board members have pointed repeatedly in recent weeks to results from other counties, including a 43 percent reported jump in homelessness in Orange County.
“If you look at our neighboring counties, their growth in homelessness reported already is humongous and it will be way more than twice as much or even three times as much as what we will experience here,” Supervisor Sheila Kuehl said.
Even the lowest double digit increase in homelessness in Los Angeles County would mean another 5,000 people without housing. Last year’s count calculated 52,765 homeless individuals countywide, roughly half of whom were living in their cars, tents or other makeshift shelters.
County officials said their multi-faceted approach is working, pointing to success in moving more than 14,000 people into permanent housing and more than double that number into crisis or bridge housing using Measure H funding.
But more people are also falling into homelessness, leading the county to focus on economic drivers like rising rental rates and steady employment as part of the solution.
“People are struggling to find apartments and housing within their means,” Supervisor Hilda Solis said, noting that nearly 60 percent of county residents live in rental housing.
The county has put a 3 percent cap on rental increases in unincorporated areas and is backing statewide legislation to limit rents and prevent landlords from unjustly evicting tenants. But California voters rejected a 2018 proposal to give local governments more latitude to enact rent controls.
The strategies proposed as part of the $460 million county plan are wide-ranging and include $92.8 million to strengthen the shelter system, $85.4 million for rapid re-housing and $77.3 million in rental subsidies. Millions of dollars will also be spent on staffing to reach out to and support homeless individuals.
Phil Ansell, who oversees the county’s homeless initiatives, said the county has mobilized roughly 800 outreach coordinators, most of whom work for community-based organizations.
The most obvious metric of success of county programs would be a drop in homelessness, but that seems unlikely in the short term and the supervisors stressed the complexity of the problem and urged taxpayers to continue to back their work.
“I have said to my taxpayers, you are making a difference in individual lives. Now we have to work on prevention, because as more and more people fall for the first time into homelessness, we have to look at the causes,” Kuehl said. “But I think the taxpayers should be very pleased with the lives that they’ve saved.”
Ansell said once people have the opportunity to access housing, they stay off the streets.
“Our data shows that well over 90 percent of formerly homeless adults and families who enter permanent supportive housing remain permanently housed after one year,” Ansell said.
Even more money than expected has been raised through the quarter-cent sales tax increase approved by voters in 2017.
Putting all that money to work has proven challenging as both public and private sector providers work to ramp up capacity, but the county says that just $15 million of Measure H spending for the county’s last fiscal year, or less than 5 percent of the total, went unspent and will be carried over to this year.
The county expects to house 30,000 people in interim housing next year, a goal it fell short of this year.
“This is a massive undertaking and by all comparative standards our system has ramped up and expanded at a very quick rate,” Ansell told the board.
Ansell highlighted new initiatives for the coming year, including an employment task force and a jobs training program with stipends for 250 people.
The board also approved motions to redirect $700,000 in funding to efforts to find housing and services for homeless community college students and another $600,000 to expand mobile shower facilities.
“What we know works, we need to get on it and we need to expand it,” Solis said.
It’s not just Measure H dollars that fund the fight against homelessness. The county is also using significant funding from the Mental Health Services Act to pay for homeless initiatives linked to mental illness and substance abuse, for example.
Supervisor Kathryn Barger emphasized the need to continue that support.
“It is our responsibility to help those who cannot, for whatever reason, seek assistance for themselves,” she said. “Combating this crisis is incredibly complicated work, but I continue to believe in the diverse and powerful strategies as we fund Measure H.”
–
Aaron Lett says
Thank you all for your hard work and commitment on this matter. It’s tragic to watch as my beautiful State descends into chaos and poverty. I was myself once homeless but I managed to keep my car running and was able to work 7 days a week for two different employers until I saved up enough money to drop a down payment on an apartment, where I still reside. California’s insane gas prices and smog fees didn’t help. Especially when your car fails smog and you must scrounge up 700 dollars to buy a catalytic converter or accept your new life being forever homeless. Your laws make the difference between success or failure for us. This State makes it too hard for most citizens. Whatever happened to manifest destiny?
Down and Out says
I am about to be homeless soon. I am 59 years old, on disability and only get $850 per month. There is no way to survive on that! I have called numerous senior subsidized housing places, however, the waiting lists are 10 years! I will be dead buy then! So now it looks like I will be living in my two-seater car. I have been diligently looking for part time office help, but as you get older, nobody wants to hire you. They want the younger ones in there. It’s really not fair that I have paid my taxes when I was working, but we have people who are in this country illegally living in Section 8 housing and there is nothing left for the American citizens! That really sucks!
Adina Ramirez says
I work with the homeless. They prefer to live on the streets with zero responsibility.
Richie says
Exactly.
Tim Scott says
Really? So, is that information based on personal interviews you’ve had with all fifty thousand of them, or are you just making a broad prejudicial generalization because it fits your agenda?
Don’t bother to answer, I think we all know already and would prefer that you just shut up.
Question Lancaster Authority says
What happened to the million dollars the County gave Lancaster for homelessness? Bueller? Bueller? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Richie says
Do these homeless people look like they owned or rented a home? NO! They don’t want help. They want a handout. Stop throwing away hard earned tax payer money away you idiots!! And these rental vouchers you are giving away is ruining nearby communities too! All you’re doing is creating a bigger problem. Stop throwing away our tax dollars. Use that money for infrastructure…highways…expanded freeways etc… Use it to clean up the city of all these bums. If you clean up the mess, the bugs will leave!!!
Unsheltered says
“…but all indications are that the trend will be up, perhaps dramatically.”
And just wait until the next recession hits…
Sandra says
Pleeeeeezzzeeeee!!!!! Well over 90 percent of the adults and families who enter permanent support housing remain permanently house after one year. 90 percent of what 2 adults and 2 families. Why is there any prop H funds from last year left over for this year? … wait you could not find any homeless families to help with that money. And if you see the task as humongous and incredibly complicated then maybe you should put some better and brighter minds to the task of ending homelessness. Taxpayers are becoming homeless because of property taxes. Why do you expect such a big jump in the numbers of homeless people? What’s going to happen? Is the economy is going to take a dump? Rents are going to rise? Home prices are going to tank? What is going to happen to make numbers jump?
Tim Scott says
The number of homeless people rises because the number of housing units doesn’t rise anywhere near as fast as the population. Homeless people, as best they can manage, will migrate to where the weather is least likely to kill them, and that’s southern California.
That lack of housing production isn’t directly related to property taxes. Preventing production of housing does make property values rise faster, so it does indirectly affect property taxes which also rise with property value. But the idea that property owners, who are benefiting from the increasing property values, are “becoming homeless due to property taxes” is a reach.
If they aren’t really a property owner, ie they are actually leveraged into their home and have no equity so they are really just a tenant in a property owned by a bank, they can be forced out “by taxes,” but more realistically they are being forced out because they have consumed equity as fast as it has been produced. Usually those people are first in line crying against providing more housing because they are desperate for another bump in property value to produce some equity they can borrow against.
Brian K. says
You are right Sandra; there are some taxpayers becoming homeless because of property taxes.