LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a wide-ranging set of recommendations Tuesday to combat homelessness, committing to spend nearly $259 million over the next 12 months. [View the plan approved by the Board here.]
Chief Executive Officer Sachi Hamai said the county’s plan will move 45,000 families and individuals into permanent housing over the next five years and prevent another 30,000 from falling into homelessness.
The funding comes from a quarter-cent sales tax increase approved by voters in March. The tax will take effect Oct. 1, but Homeless Initiative Director Phil Ansell said the services approved by the board would get underway July 1.
The recommendations represent a hard-won consensus of a working group of 50 representatives of public and private organizations, as well as feedback from public hearings, Ansell said. Strategies include outreach, crisis housing, permanent housing and prevention.
The vote comes less than two weeks after the release of the latest count by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority showing a 23 percent increase in homelessness countywide since 2016.
Chris Ko, director of homeless initiatives for the United Way of Greater Los Angeles, remains optimistic despite those numbers.
“We find them daunting, but we are not daunted,” Ko told the board.
During an earlier rally outside the Hall of Administration, Ko said the strategies for fighting homelessness struck a balance between providing immediate relief and developing longer-term, holistic solutions.
In addition to a unanimous vote in favor of the working group’s proposals, the supervisors signed off on several related motions and amendments, which include finding funding for at least 200 beds of crisis housing for female victims of domestic violence, help for homeless college students and childcare for working homeless residents.
Most advocates for the homeless praised the county’s plans, although many sought more money for particular programs or constituencies.
Several people said more funding should be earmarked for black homeless individuals.
“I’d like to acknowledge that our county is approximately 8 percent black and our homeless population is approximately 40 percent black,” said Tiffany Duvernay, a formerly homeless woman who contributed her “lived experience” as part of the 50-person county panel.
Duvernay asked the board to allocate more money to faith-based organizations.
Sheriff Jim McDonnell, speaking for the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs’ Association, called for more funding for law enforcement outreach to mentally ill homeless individuals.
“This is a bottom-line community policing philosophy,” McDonnell said. “We all have to work together on this.”
Supervisor Hilda Solis agreed.
“Not all of them are there to put handcuffs on people,” Solis said of the many law enforcement officers who know the people on the street and refer them to mental health teams and other resources.
Even with hundreds of millions of dollars in new funding for the next 10 years, major challenges remain.
Building new housing will require “pushing back `nimbyism’ (not in my backyard) … to house our brothers and sisters,” said Ann Sewill of the California Community Foundation.
“People want to address it, but aren’t sure that they want to address it in their backyard,” Supervisor Janice Hahn said.
Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the Antelope Valley, said board members would have to do their own extensive outreach to change attitudes in the communities they represent.
Barger said she tells residents: “These individuals are already living in the community. The question is whether we’re going to give them a roof over their head.”
The board also approved preliminary funding recommendations totaling more than $1 billion over the next three fiscal years.
7 comments for "L.A. County lays out plan to fight homelessness"
Deport illegals, end anchor babies.
Build the wall
Quit giving billions of dollars to other Countries.
I say raise sales tax to 20%
Then we will SOLVE homelessness.
Chris B says
Actually, there are serious theories about consumption taxes as the best way to combat poverty as well as environmental destruction.
The FairTax solution is one to look into if tax policy interests you.
I rather have The NoTax solution.
… saddled a devious, disingenuous, two-faced policy community in Sacramento and Los Angeles County, professing to combat homelessness out one side of their mouths, while out the other, they’ve doubled vehicle registration fees, imposed measure H upon us under false pretense, saddled us another 12 cent per gallon excise tax, and over-assess our property tax asunder. Many thanks to our tax-and-spend Democratic majority, soon enough we’ll all be homeless –
Chris B says
Your concern is valid, but the money must come from somewhere, and they figure taxing property owners is the way to do it. Unfortunately, it squeezes those property owners that are struggling, as the affluent enjoy tax deductions from owning multiple homes. It appears a shift in tax policy is the answer!
From the AV says
Lets hope that the bulk of this funding goes to its intended purpose,& not into the politicians pockets..