The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Local
    • Palmdale
    • Lancaster
    • Los Angeles County
    • Littlerock
    • Lake Los Angeles
    • Rosamond
    • Edwards AFB
    • Acton
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Advertise
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Show Search

Palmdale continues to appeal voting rights court decision despite Supreme Court snub

by Jim E. Winburn • August 21, 2014

CourtPALMDALE – Palmdale received another legal setback when the California Supreme Court refused to review its appeal over the California Voting Rights Act court decision against the city from Nov. 27. City officials responded with a statement Wednesday announcing that their attorneys are preparing final appeal briefs on the original trial decision for the currently pending decision in the Court of Appeals.

“While we are disappointed that the Supreme Court is not taking up this case, we are moving forward in the Court of Appeals to work toward protecting our citizens’ constitutional right to determine the manner and method of electing their city leaders,” said Assistant City Attorney Noel Doran in a released statement.

In what may be one of the city’s last legal options to fight the original court ruling, Palmdale City Attorney Matthew Ditzhazy explained what is at stake in the city’s appeal of this decision pending in the Court of Appeals.

“That appeal is primarily over the evidence submitted and the trial court’s remedies which include districts, changed election dates, shortened terms of council members and other items,” Ditzhazy said. “We are currently preparing our briefs for submission later this month.”

Palmdale has appealed the original trial court’s ruling in its entirety, including the requirement that the city accept geographic district elections per the court order.

Palmdale announced in early December 2013 that it would fight the Nov. 27 court decision forcing the city to replace its at-large elections with an electoral process that would divide the city into four districts – each choosing its own council member.

The city filed a notice of appeal on Jan. 8 to the court decision from its Voting Rights Lawsuit, which effectively blocked the court’s decision to force Palmdale to hold district elections in June.

According to an earlier press statement by Ditzhazy, the appeal of Judge Mooney’s final order, which would “permanently enjoin at-large elections” and required a district-based election on June 3, was supposed to put everything on hold until the Court of Appeals rules on it.

However, Palmdale’s appeal to the Supreme Court was over the certification issue for the November 2013 election and the Charter City issue, where the California Constitution grants cities “plenary authority” to conduct its own elections, the news release stated.

Fred Thompson's appointment to the council holds extreme significance for Palmdale because the lawsuit against the city claims its at-large elections prevent minority voters, especially African-Americans and Hispanics, from holding office.
Fred Thompson’s appointment to the council holds extreme significance for Palmdale because the lawsuit against the city claims its at-large elections prevent minority voters, especially African-Americans and Hispanics, from holding office.

Fred Thompson became the first African-American to be elected to the Palmdale City Council in the city’s Nov. 8, 2013 election, and Palmdale takes issue with the lawsuit filed by plaintiff’s attorneys Kevin Shenkman and Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris, which prevented certification of the election.

“We are stunned that the actions of the plaintiffs allegedly in the name of minority rights have actually resulted in preventing an African-American from holding office,” Doran said.

Thompson was subsequently appointed to a council seat after the resignation of former Councilmember Laura Bettencourt, who did not seek re-election for her seat in November 2013.

–

Previous related stories:

Palmdale to continue fighting Voting Rights Act ruling

Thompson appointed to council vacancy

Lancaster compliant with Voting Rights Act, expert claims

Palmdale to residents: All elections are on!

Palmdale to appeal judge’s decision to cancel council election

Shenkman/Parris file injunction to halt Palmdale election

–

About the author

Jim E. Winburn is freelance reporter covering news of public interest.

Filed Under: Palmdale, Politics

Recent Comments

  • Rodney Smith on Rapid COVID tests available at JetHawks Stadium, free to Lancaster residents: “Do you need an appointment at Jethawk Stadium also what are the hours for free COVID tests” Jan 27, 15:59
  • Beecee on Readers Speak Out!: “Good lord…” Jan 27, 15:52
  • Matt on Readers Speak Out!: “Need to look no further than Trump himself threatening with his own party. Party doesnt have to be a 50/50…” Jan 27, 15:29
  • tsparky on Readers Speak Out!: “Sure, do you know why Dave? They have already incorporated in Texas and transferred all their assets from the NY…” Jan 27, 15:08
  • XB51 on Readers Speak Out!: “A Patriot or Trumpist#1: One need only to look up the name Russell Vought, and quickly learn he is a…” Jan 27, 13:55

© 2021 · The Antelope Valley Times. All rights reserved. Terms of Use